标题: Economist阅读-婚姻与收入 [打印本页] 作者: 退隐网络 时间: 2010-10-25 11:03 标题: Economist阅读-婚姻与收入 There is a widening gulf between how the best- and least-educated Americans approach marriage and child-rearing. Among the elite （excluding film stars）,the nuclear family is holding up quite well. Only 4% of the children of mothers with college degrees are born out of marriage. And the divorce rate among college-educated women has dropped. Of those who first tied the knot between 1975 and 1979,29% were divorced within ten years. Among those who first married between 1990 and 1994,only 16.5% were.
At the bottom of the education scale,the picture is reversed. Among high-school dropouts, the divorce rate rose from 38% for those who first married in 1975-79 to 46% for those who first married in 1990-94. Among those with a high school diploma but no college, it rose from 35% to 38%. And these figures are only part of the story. Many mothers avoid divorce by never marrying in the first place. The out-of-wedlock birth rate among women who drop out of high school is 15%.
The “marriage gap” is one of the chief sources of the country's notorious and widening inequality. Middle-class kids growing up with two biological parents are “socialised for success”. They do better in school,get better jobs and go on to create families of their own. Children of single parents or broken families do worse in school,get worse jobs and go on to have children out of wedlock. This makes it more likely that those born near the top or the bottom will stay where they started.
A large majority—92%—of children whose families make more than $75,000 a year live with two parents （including step-parents).At the bottom of the income scale—families earning less than $15,000—only 20% of children live with two parents. One might imagine that this gap arises simply because two breadwinners earn more than one. A single mother would have to be unusually talented and diligent to make as much as $75,000 while also raising children on her own. And it is impossible in America for two full-time,year-round workers to earn less than $15,000 between them.
But there is more to it than this. Marriage itself is a wealth-generating institution. Those who marry “till death do us part” end up,on average,four times richer than those who never marry. This is partly because marriage provides economies of scale—two can live more cheaply than one—and because the kind of people who make more money—those who work hard, plan for the future and have good interpersonal skills—are more likely to marry and stay married. But it is also because marriage affects the way people behave.
American men,once married,tend to take their responsibilities seriously. Married men drink less, take fewer drugs and work harder,earning between 10% and 40% more than single men with similar schooling and job histories. And marriage encourages both spouses to save and invest more for the future. Each partner provides the other with a form of insurance against falling sick or losing a job. Marriage also encourages the division of labour. As Adam Smith observed two centuries ago,when you specialise,you get better at what you do,and you produce more.
1. Which of the following did NOT happen during 1975-1994？
[A] Less people who received high education got divorced.
[B] More high school dropouts failed their first marriage.
[C] Many women did not marry because of their reluctance of children-rearing.
[D] The divorce rate of high school graduates increased.
2. We can learn from the text that middle-class children tend to have the following characteristics EXCEPT_______. [A] good appearances
[B] high school grades
[C] well-paid jobs
[D] happy family
3. The behavior of married people is probably more_______.
[A] negative
[B] positive
[C] active
[D] people‘s behavior won’t be influenced by marriage.
4. A single mother， according to the text， probably _______.
[A] has an easy and simple life
[B] finds herself busy with both work and child.
[C] is very smart and does well in her job.
[D] can save more money than when she‘s in a marriage.
5. What we can learn about American people‘s opinions towards marriage？
[A] Movie stars tend to remain in stable and happy marriage.
[B] More women want to have child out of wedlock.
[C] People‘s views of marriages are greatly influenced by their parents.
[D] People marry because specialization helps produce more.
gulf [gQlf]n. 深渊， 隔阂 diploma [di`plEumE] n. 文凭， 毕业证书
approach [E`prEutF] n.方法步骤 wedlock [`wedlCk] n. 结婚生活， 婚姻
rear [riFE] vt.培养， 饲养 diligent [`dilidVEnt] adj. 勤勉的， 用功的
reverse [ri`vE：s] vt.颠倒， 倒转 economy of scale 规模经济
dropout n. 退学学生， 辍学学生
难句突破
This is partly because marriage provides economies of scale—two can live more cheaply than one—and because the kind of people who make more money—those who work hard， plan for the future and have good interpersonal skills—are more likely to marry and stay married.
主体句式 This is partly because … and because …
结构分析 这个句子主要由两个部分组成，在“and because”之前是一部分，说明了第一个原因，其中两个破折号之间的部分是用来解释什么是“economies of scale”。“and because”之后说明了第二个原因，其主句为“the kind of people are more likely to marry and stay married”，其中两个破折号之间的内容是用来进一步说明前面提到的那一类人。
句子译文 一方面这是因为婚姻可以产生规模经济效应—两个人生活比一个人生活更加节约—另一方面那些能赚更多钱的人—那些辛勤工作、计划未来而且拥有很好交际能力的人—更可能结婚并一直保持婚姻。